Claude Code CLI: Fixing Directory Permission Re-request Issues
Understanding the Directory Permission Problem with Claude Code CLI
When working with Claude Code CLI, particularly after a session reset, you might encounter a frustrating issue related to directory permissions. This article dives deep into this problem, offering insights and potential solutions to streamline your workflow. The core issue revolves around how the CLI handles directory permissions after a session reset, such as when you run wsl --shutdown or switch models. After such a reset, the chat context often remains intact, but the execution sandbox, along with its session-specific whitelist, is cleared. This discrepancy leads to the assistant assuming it still possesses access to certain paths, resulting in blocked ls commands and a less-than-ideal user experience.
After a session reset, the chat context remains, but the execution sandbox and its whitelist are reset. When you try to access a directory that's no longer whitelisted, the assistant often assumes it still has permission. It then sends a bash ls command, which gets blocked. What's worse, it doesn't immediately prompt you to add the directory as a working directory. This lack of immediate feedback can be confusing, making it seem like the model is unaware of the reset permissions.
This problem arises because the model doesn't realize that the environment requires re-authorization. The assistant issues a bash ls /home/yang, which is then blocked with a message indicating that Claude Code can only list files in allowed working directories. The expected behavior would be an immediate interactive prompt asking to add /home/yang as a working directory. Instead, the prompt only appears after a subsequent or slightly altered request. This inconsistency creates a disjointed user experience, where the assistant's actions don't align with the actual state of its permissions. Addressing this issue is crucial for ensuring a smoother, more intuitive interaction with the Claude Code CLI, especially in environments where session resets are frequent.
Reproducing the Issue: A Step-by-Step Guide
To better understand the issue, let's walk through the steps to reproduce it:
- Reset your WSL environment: Execute
wsl --shutdownand then reopen WSL. Ensure your current working directory is/mnt/c/Users/yang. - Ask the assistant to view a directory: Use a natural language request like "List /home/yang" or "Check /home/yang".
- Observe the initial behavior: The assistant will issue a bash
ls /home/yangcommand. This command will be blocked, and you'll see a message indicating that Claude Code can only list files in allowed working directories. Critically, no interactive prompt to add/home/yangwill appear. - Repeat the request: Ask the same question again or rephrase it slightly. This time, an interactive prompt may appear, asking you to add
/home/yangas a working directory. Choosing to add the directory will allow subsequentls /home/yangcommands to succeed. - Repeat from step 1: You'll find that the behavior repeats consistently. The first attempt after a reset fails to prompt for permission, while later attempts succeed.
By following these steps, you can reliably reproduce the issue and gain a firsthand understanding of the problem.
Why This Matters: The User Experience Impact
The core of the problem lies in the disconnect between the perceived state of the assistant and the actual state of its permissions. Chat continuity suggests that state is preserved across sessions, but the execution permissions are, in fact, reset. The assistant's failure to reflect this reset leads to user confusion and unnecessary retries. This creates a perception that the model believes it still has permission when it doesn't. When users encounter such inconsistencies, it undermines their confidence in the tool and increases the cognitive load required to complete tasks. This ultimately detracts from the overall user experience, making it crucial to address and resolve the permission re-request issue in Claude Code CLI.
The continuity of the chat interface leads users to assume that permissions are also maintained, but the reality is that execution permissions are reset. This discrepancy creates confusion and requires extra attempts to achieve the desired outcome. Users often perceive this as the model